ONMG... how does that work?

[*NADS Capt. Anarchy]

ok.. help me through this:

?K is number 2 in RS battle league
?K is number 3 in R6 battel league
and...
?K is number 1 in overall.

huh? how's that work out?

[PsYcO aSsAsSiN]

They lied about playing R6. By putting that down, they got the de-facto 10 points awarded to them for being on a ladder. That 10 points thrust them into first place by something like 2 points.

I would remove them from the R6 ladder, but nix accidently post their RSD cb in the R6 ladder.  

[*NADS Capt. Anarchy]

well.. i suppose that makes sense. kinda scary though

[Typhy]

Yes, Assassin, you should not be mad at |?K| For that, Thats Nixon's fault, and if I had the choice I would rather have it in the RSD ladder, Theres no way in hell that we will win the R6 ladder

Typhy

[Bondo]

If you do want a R6 CB, maybe I could round up one of my decrepit teammates and we could limp into GR and CB you.

BTW, is it not possible to delete scores once they've been sent?  That is a bit of a bummer.

[Zomar]

rah bondo cb rah  

[|?K|*R?p!d?*]

SCRIPT ERROR with RSD Ladder back in February, that's how. ?That R6 win is supposed to be a RSD win. ?Our first defeat of GSA. ?The boards was messed up and when the moderators went to turn in our RSD win, it went to R6, that's how that happened. ?Then GSA came back and called us out on a rematch, which we won again, and that win til this day, has never been turned in. ?So that's how that R6 win got there Capt. ?Not us lying like assassin tries to put it, but a Script mistake back in February which has obviously been fixed. ?How bout inputing that 2nd RSD win vs. GSA now? ?How much longer does it need to be reviewed by Mauti and Elandrion assassin?? ?And please don't dare use the line "|?K| lied" cuz we don't lie. ?End of story. ?Assassin even took the time when we asked him about it before and he had no problem explaining, so for assassin to come in here and say that... ?Lying to you Capt to make us look bad... ?And I thought he was starting to change for the better...

If Everything was in their correct spot, we would have 0 R6 wins and 3 RSD wins, making us #1 in RSD where |?K| originally started.

[|?K|*R?p!d?*]

Ok, my bad, assassin didnt say we lied about turning in a R6 win as I just re-read and realized.  He states that we are in the R6 ladder and that's "why" we are in #1.  We do have R6, even though we are NOT good at it.  Being that most Action is on RS, we haven't CB'ed in R6.  Doesn't mean that we won't and Bondo, I would CB, yes.  It's all in fun and you can show me how good you are  |?K|*R?p!d?*

[Bondo]

Zomar what do you say, I need your mad hosting abilities.  I can pretty much play anytime though so how bout you pick something Zom.  We'll get you a legit R6 battle so the losers can stop whining about it.

Anyway, I hope you are serious when you say you suck at R6 Rapid, because I haven't played for 6 months.  

[*DAMN Elandrion]

@Bondo: nope, only I can change the posted results once a match has been posted, and it's quite complicated...

@Capt. Anarchy: it is (mostly) the "fault" of the Points System that ?K is in the front, because they played and won more CB's than any other clan. If you could see their ELO score, they would be in 5th place overall...

*DAMN Elandrion

[|?K|*R?p!d?*]

Elo, isn't ur point system based on percentages??  And that being the case if, wouldn't it make it nearly impossible to get to the top once you start losing CB's?  In other words, a clan that has a 7-0, meaning they only had 7 CB's, would be ahead of a clan with 11-6, meaning they had 17 CB's?  How exactly would that work again?  Can you refresh my memory please.  |?K|*R?p!d?*

[PsYcO aSsAsSiN]

Rapid, if the system was based on percentages, you would be hanging around 6th/7th place.

The current system takes into account the amount of points of the loser and how many people were participating in the cb.

Seeing how certain clans are gloating about their position on the ladder (I will not name names, you know who you are) don't be surprised if the points system gets modified to penalize you for losses.

[Bondo]

So, my system still isn't out of consideration? ?Just add in the teamsize for each CB (since you seem to like that) and mine would be ready to roll.

[Typhy]

Bondo: I supose that if you want we can get a R6 team together and battle you at it. . . Please notify us first though . . . We don't usually play R6 though so we will need some time to practice.

[Bondo]

Although I was doing fairly well last night, I need practice as well so we don't need to rush into the CB.  Maybe by the time you are ready I'll have my buddy Bander back on and we'll put on the "Bondo and Bander Show".

[|?K|*R?p!d?*]

I love how all these rulez revolve around us being #1 and ways certain people(Won't mention names, you know who you are) are trying to bring us down.  I know what the current point system is and was talking to Elandrion, not assassin.  I was commenting on the percentage point system, which I dont agree in, and was asking Elandrion to elaborate on it since he knows most about it and I wanted him to explain how it would work.  A clan that CB's more deserves more credit than a clan that CB's less.  Otherwise some clans would get a 7-0 Record and sit at top with 100%.  Anyway, this is isn't how the current point system is, but I heard this was another system you had and wanted to learn more about it.  I would like to hear Elandrion's point of view, not assassin's(since most times he has negative comments to say towards me or my clan)  Thanks.

[Bondo]

Well, I'll always have my system in its holster, just tell me you want to look at it again and I'll dust it off, revise it and chuck it on the table.

BTW, Rapid, my system gave points based on CBs played in addition to other stuff, so a clan with a 7-0 record could be behind a clan with a 7-7 record, and rightfully so, if you want to be on top, you have to play.  Now hopefully there would be a 9-5 team or something that  would actually be on top but at least my system gave incentive to those playing not just those winning.

[*DAMN Elandrion]

Rapid, as far as I can remember, when there was the discussion which points system to take, I posted a few things about them, including very detailed info. So I recommend that you just browse through the BattleLeague forum, there you'll find your info...

*DAMN Elandrion

[Grifter]

BTW, Rapid, my system gave points based on CBs played in addition to other stuff, so a clan with a 7-0 record could be behind a clan with a 7-7 record, and rightfully so, if you want to be on top, you have to play. ?Now hopefully there would be a 9-5 team or something that ?would actually be on top but at least my system gave incentive to those playing not just those winning.

Said it then, and I'll say it again... that's only fair if there's a challenge system Bondo... because if a clan is up there just because they CB newbies... and undefeated clans keep getting turned down.. then then they should be punished for NOT CB'ing.  i.e. if a clan is in first place at 9-5 and refused to cb the clan at 7-0...  then they don't deserve to be in first place... now do they?  Same goes for the 7-0 clan...

I mean, you are punishing the clans that others wont CB with your system if there isn't a challenge built in.

[Bondo]

Well, I am one of the largest proponents of the Challenge system aren't I?