*DAMN R6
.:Navigation:| Home | Battle League | Forum | Mac Downloads | PC Downloads | Cocobolo Mods |:.

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 30, 2025, 08:08:38 pm

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
One Worldwide Gaming Community since 13th June 2000
132957 Posts in 8693 Topics by 2294 Members
Latest Member: xoclipse2020
* Home Help Search Login Register
 Ads
+  *DAMN R6 Forum
|-+  *DAMN R6 Community
| |-+  General Gossip (Moderators: Grifter, cookie, *DAMN Hazard, c| Lone-Wolf, BTs_GhostSniper)
| | |-+  Alternative Energy Sources
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Alternative Energy Sources  (Read 5256 times)
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
The Ghost of Bondo
Guest
« Reply #40 on: February 17, 2003, 03:58:11 pm »

Wouldn't the pollution be worse if it used a fossil fuel like methane or propane?  With water you get...water.  If you take the hydrogen off of methane and propane you still have cabon and oxygen.
Logged
|MP|Buccaneer
*DAMN Supporter
God bless the freaks
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2201



WWW
« Reply #41 on: February 17, 2003, 06:55:52 pm »

Well, if you burn (aka OXIDATE) hydrogen, you get water.  That's one chemical reaction you are talking about.

But, when you are talking about fuel cells, you aren't talking about a direct combustion reaction.  You are talking about chemical reactions that work kinda like the lead/acid battery in your car, with Ions exchanging electrons, yadda yadda yadda.

In a nutshell, since you don't burn the natural gas, you aren't just combining the hydrogen with oxygen and the carbon with oxygen (giving you the CO and CO2 that you are worried about).  Instead, some of the carbon is deposited as solids (nothing wrong with creating coal, graphite or diamond deposits in your basement  Grin  kidding).  Some is given off as CO2, but that's not a big problem either, not like the emissions given off from burning hydrocarbons (it's supposed to be cleaner then burning methane, which is considered about as clean as you can burn), and not in high amounts.
Logged

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Screw the pussy isolationists and their shortsightedness - Buccaneer
The Ghost of Bondo
Guest
« Reply #42 on: February 17, 2003, 08:50:49 pm »

So there would be some release of CO and CO2 as opposed to just water with the pure hydrogen cell...but it is still a very clean source for the amount of energy obtained?  I suppose that is a reasonable tradeoff.
Logged
|MP|Buccaneer
*DAMN Supporter
God bless the freaks
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2201



WWW
« Reply #43 on: February 17, 2003, 09:08:26 pm »

So there would be some release of CO and CO2 as opposed to just water with the pure hydrogen cell...but it is still a very clean source for the amount of energy obtained?  I suppose that is a reasonable tradeoff.

I'm glossing over the chemistry a little, but I don't think many people care.  The short answer is yes.  Except drop the CO, one of the systems I was looking at would release CO2 only (and some solids, which don't matter), not CO, which makes a difference.  It would also be in less amounts then if you were just burning the natural gas, like we do today for heat and hot water and cooking.
Logged

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Screw the pussy isolationists and their shortsightedness - Buccaneer
kami
God bless the freaks
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1095


You're not a man without *NADS.


« Reply #44 on: February 17, 2003, 10:24:03 pm »

Large amounts of CO2 is bad as well...
Logged

*NADS toilet cleaner goldylocks

'There is nothing divine about morality, it is a purely human affair.' - Albert Einstein
'With soap, baptism is a good thing.' - Robert G. Ingersoll
The Ghost of Bondo
Guest
« Reply #45 on: February 17, 2003, 11:19:53 pm »

Large amounts of CO2 is bad as well...

True, but this wouldn't be large amounts seemingly, it would certainly be a huge reduction over the present.
Logged
|MP|Buccaneer
*DAMN Supporter
God bless the freaks
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2201



WWW
« Reply #46 on: February 18, 2003, 12:03:31 am »

Kami, Bondo got it right with we aren't talking about as large of amounts.

And large amounts of O2 in the air isn't great either, just for different reasons.  But if we are seperating water for hydrogen, where's all that oxygen going?

We aren't just burning the hydrogen, so it all isnt' going back to water.
Logged

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Screw the pussy isolationists and their shortsightedness - Buccaneer
kami
God bless the freaks
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1095


You're not a man without *NADS.


« Reply #47 on: February 18, 2003, 02:04:30 am »

Well I'm no expert so don't ask me.
Logged

*NADS toilet cleaner goldylocks

'There is nothing divine about morality, it is a purely human affair.' - Albert Einstein
'With soap, baptism is a good thing.' - Robert G. Ingersoll
alaric
Forum Whore
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 637


What good is life if you don't have freedom?


WWW
« Reply #48 on: February 18, 2003, 06:14:18 am »

I've heard of conversion kits for cars and lawn mowers such where by making some pretty basic modifications to the engine, you can actually turn it into a hydrogen combustion engine. The drawback is a 30-40 percent reduction in horsepower. Has anyone else heard of such a thing?
Logged

"I would rather have incompetence and abuse of power than a group of people who want to bow down to the French and the United Nations." - BTs Ghostsniper, June 17, 2004, 01:44:16 PM
|MP|Buccaneer
*DAMN Supporter
God bless the freaks
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2201



WWW
« Reply #49 on: February 18, 2003, 04:47:21 pm »

Yep.  But it's more then a 40% reduction in power.

There are kits out there to convert it gasoline powered ICE's (Internal Combustion Engine's) to run on gases (propane, methane, hydrogen).  There has been work done on this since the mid 70's at universities.

The problem is that ICE's function off pressure.  The smaller the molecule, the smaller the pressure difference (and like I posted earlier, with hydrogen, it would lose pressure if it werent for the heat).  ICE's are just not the right type of engine for the lighter gases.  So the smaller the molecule you use, the less power you get.  Which all means that these kits aren't really worth shit.  You are better off finding a kit that lets your ICE run off alcohol (which means it can take more heat).

The fuel cells we've been talking about don't try to use hydrogen or methane as a fuel replacement in a mechanical engine.  They generate it chemically.  They are like a giant D-Cell battery, but instead of using acids (technically, free hydrogen is acting like an acid though if you know chem), it uses hydrogen.  And instead of being a sealed battery, you can keep adding it.

Logged

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke

Screw the pussy isolationists and their shortsightedness - Buccaneer
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  



 Ads
Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 19 queries.