*DAMN R6 Forum

Watched it on the news, every bloody count they found him not guilty. Can someone please explain the Criminal Justice system over there for me please? I was just told that if only one member of the jury has 'significant doubt' then the defendant is acquitted.... surely not?

As for Jacko - feels a bit like OJ Simpson again. IF you have the money etc you can get away with anything.

I don't know about this one, I was a fan of MJ in my younger years  ::)  and I believe that deep down he is a good person.

"I was a fan of MJ in my younger years"... "deep down he is a good person"... *COUGH* Shade....... ::lol::

No, not at all.  If a jury is not in 100% agreement after however long they need to decide then it is considered a "hung jury" and the trial begins all over again from square one.

For all charges to be cleared all 12 jurours must vote that way on every single count.  The credibility of the witnesses put forth by the prosecution was laughable and this verdict was to be expected.  If MJ were to be convicted based on the facts presented in this trial, from what I know of anyway, I would think the American justice system was far worse off.

Civic, he was one of the children in Michael Jacksons secret bedroom.

d'uh, you got my hint. :P

Neverland is my....um....second home.

It's things like this that make me glad the U.S. is not in control of Saddam's trial...

You'd rather have it that people are prosecuted left and right without any real evidence?  You'd rather an innocent man be sent to prison, or worse, than have the occasional guilty party beat a charge?

Interesting...

why do people want to see michael jackson get busted so bad? if you were even paying attention to the case (and i know you were since it was shoved in your face every day by the media) you would understand why he was acquitted. it was obviously an attempt to extract money from jackson based on the timeline of events, the patchy stories from the accusers, the testimonies against the accusers, and just the general nature of the mother (obviously convinced her shitfaced kids to get dirt on him so they could get his money). the prosecution's entire case was based entirely on the mother's poorly orchestrated con job.

so he's innocent, let's stop this depressing sadist celebrity trial orgasm garbage and stfu now.

... jury giving a press conference?

... Jury member saying she started to doubt things when she [mother of one of the kids] snapped her fingers?! Your not meant to make your freaking decision on whether you liked the mother snapping her fingers at you or not you stupid retard.  >:(

anyone else see the crazy guy outside saying how he 'lives' for jacko. "just to be near him" .... scary people

(http://pointlesswasteoftime.com/archive/05061401.jpg)

Foundling Home....

drop the "u"... ::)

You guys will love this....

http://download.ifilm.com/qt/portal/2672935_300.mov

lmao  ::lol::

That was funny even though I don't agree with some of it, heh.

hahahahhahahahaha


I LOVE Triumph...

hahah damn that Triumph shit is fun-neh.....His writer is quick on his feet.

OK...so he squeaked by on a technicality..( the nutso mother).
Which is sad for two reasons..1. These pricks PICK kids with nutso mothers so that they can get them alone with minimal family objection, and TWO they know they will be destroyed on the stand in the case of a trial.  Irrefutable profiling theory in practice here...


Personally, Im a fan of the "where theres smoke, theres fire' thing..
Here we go..follow me here....
if some kid accused you of doing something you DID NOT do...would you give him a sum approximately equal to A THOUSAND of your lifetime salaries NOT to have a chance to prove your innocence?
Yeah, I don't think so...If i was innocent, i would have fought tooth and nail to retain my good name and spent 30 million dollars on the best defense the world has seen since OJ....I certainly would have not given that little shit the 30 million dollars.

And if after having to pay a thousand of your salaries for being accused of said wrongdoing, would you continue to place yourself at risk of future accusations? Again..Im hoping not...But Mj did. What unbelievable arrogance.

Also, i didnt get the memo explaining why the accusers drawings and notations on the EXACT appearance (noting blotches and locations of moles) of mjs dick were NOT allowed in court? Anyone have a good explanation for that one? Dont say privacy because sneddon got LOTS of photos of said genitals...if the drawings he had didnt match EXACTLy the photos, why would he chance it by having them compared in open court?  These exclusions made me sick.

Or how bout tossing the testimony of the two security guards who were asked to bring a sweaty and aroused jackson a jar of vaseline to the bedrom while a confused and puzzled boy sat on the bed, also half naked? 

Ok, now Ill backtrack and agree they had some fucked witnesses, and if the boys testimony changed, i Do see how that jury was forced to say that the case did not meet the criterion of conviction. And i see how they were forced to find him not guilty. Given that, I guess i agree with a not guilty.

Im hoping that there is general agreement that while this case didnt meet guilty standards, Mj is STILL a child molester (no, not just ecentric...a fucking CHILD MOLESTER)..plain and simple...it just wasnt proven by this case.
Who the fuck licks a childs head while he sleeps?  Try that in public some time and see how much time you get, and low long it takes to get convicted.

That said, we have a case where a finding of Not Guilty obscuring the glaringly obvious fact that he is NOT INNOCENT..

Too bad they couldnt make a better case.
Maybe next time...cuz ya know...THIRD time's a charm.
 ::wall::

...so you saw him come in his pajamas.... yes i saw him come in his pajamas... uh huh that's what the prosecution says....



hahahahahahahahaha OMG that is funny stuff... what a joke our society is... people actually quit their jobs and moved halfway around THE WORLD!?!?! to support a has been pop star... um im thinking FOR WHAT??? did they think by showing up on the courthouse lawn that they would somehow SWAY the outcome of the trial... would YOU quit your job and dress up like BATMAN and sit on the lawn of the courthouse if michael keaton was on trial for murder... he heh he hehehehehe.
people are just sooo funny
MARCO

There is nothing wrong with a father in the same bed as his son but when its a man and some persons son there's something wrong with that. But what can i say....money buys u freedom and this just proves it.