|
Title: A poll concerning the Constitution Post by: Cossack on July 01, 2003, 09:22:46 am Keep in mind I will not hear you flames, I will just look at the numbers.
As I have said earlier I dont want BTs to have more power than NADS. It is unfair to NADS and all the clans lower than BTs. (keep in mind BTs and NADS were used as random examples). I feel that the more powerful clans are more likley to have agendas. Title: Re:A poll concerning the Constitution Post by: †FiRE Infection on July 01, 2003, 02:28:13 pm You guys need to understand the problem with 1 vote per clan, like I said in the original thread. If a vote was very close and a new rule was only passed by a couple of votes there would be many unhappy people, what if someone from BTs and One vote no but the leader from a smaller clan like SW turns the vote to yes.? That would make a lot more people unhappy than happy, considering the sizes of the clans.? This couldn't be like the Senate, because it wouldn't be fair, it would need to be like a each clan gets a larger vote by number of members which is just way too complicated. Now maybe also if only clans of a certain age are allowed to vote also.
Title: Re:A poll concerning the Constitution Post by: +MOD+26ralee on July 01, 2003, 03:27:38 pm Well then the issue becomes an age verification issue, because excluding someone from something due to age will only make them lie....it's inevitiable i see it everynight in the bar i work out thats why i have a wall of fake id's
just stating a concern Title: Re:A poll concerning the Constitution Post by: †FiRE Infection on July 01, 2003, 04:54:16 pm Not age of the people, age of the clan, there would have to be a set number of say weeks before a clan can join the council.
Title: Re:A poll concerning the Constitution Post by: BFG on July 01, 2003, 05:11:56 pm I think the age of clan was somthing that we have allready pointed out... And suggested that between 2 weeks and a month ( I prefer a month). Clans that have been active, and running for this period are then elegible.
http://dynamic.gamespy.com/~damnr6/yabbse/index.php?board=3;action=display;threadid=4415;start=0 Title: Re:A poll concerning the Constitution Post by: Mr.Mellow on July 01, 2003, 05:26:59 pm How about 1 vote for every season competed in? That'd give KoS and ViRuS the most votes I believe, which I think is pretty fair. Of course, it's not fair for the seasoned veterans who have started a new clan. Hmmm...
Title: Re:A poll concerning the Constitution Post by: BTs_eight on July 01, 2003, 05:48:21 pm Hrm..
If you give the bigger clans more votes then i can just see new clans forming with the goals of being 30+. If you give the clans that are older more votes then i see where mellow comes from... Being Virus having the most votes yet people who are those vets starting a new clan gets fuckt. How about the clans who do more an participate mre get more votes? Like after you reached 15 cbs you get an extra vote 30 cbs another vote? It's kind of like being that season's vets? Title: Re:A poll concerning the Constitution Post by: Noto on July 01, 2003, 10:35:26 pm If you take a look at my extremely long post, http://dynamic.gamespy.com/~damnr6/yabbse/index.php?board=3;action=display;threadid=4428 , I put a few reasons as to why each clan should get 1 vote and 1 vote only no matter who you are. As for my own view, what's wrong with everyone being equal? Are the larger, older clans worried about something? They really shouldn't be. I could understand if there were only a handful of clans, but there are over 30 who participate on the Ghost Recon Ladder. Also, just because a clan is new does not mean that have new members. BTs is a new clan, correct? Does this mean that the remnants of [DEA] that still exists to this day has more precedence over BTs? Afterall, [DEA] came before BTs.
---|n|`Noto |