Title: Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: |MP|Buccaneer on October 29, 2002, 07:58:26 am I wanted to post this topic so Bondo can stop poluting all the other topics with posts about what a bad person I am.
So here's where you can stay on topic Bondo. Let me have it. Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Jeb on October 29, 2002, 08:28:00 am buccaneer,
we all wubs you. But bondo doesn't because his clansite isn't hosted on your servers. bondo usualy has issues with people who challenge him, take the "about ace" topic in the Uber Leet forum. I wish you luck with getting flamed by bondo (http://dynamic.gamespy.com/~damnr6/yabbse/YaBBImages/beer.gif) Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: *NADS Capt. Anarchy on October 29, 2002, 09:26:43 am i'm not sure... but i'm hoping bucc means "bad" in a naughty way ;)
Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: EUR_Zaitsev on October 29, 2002, 12:58:45 pm 1. I strongly doubt Bondo as a person veiws you as a bad man
2. I doubt if he did it would have anything to do with hosting his site on your servers Either way you guys have very different political views and he doesnt think your a bad, bad man but I doubt the I would liek Strom Therman regardless dont take it personally if ya do just try to remember we are all here just to have fun and chat and play games. Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: jn.loudnotes on October 29, 2002, 01:33:53 pm I can't speak for Bondo's opinion about you, but why do you have such harsh feelings against him?
Stupid is as stupid does. . . Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Mattster on October 29, 2002, 02:16:50 pm Yes we wubs u buccy. I wish you luck with taking the flame.
Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: tasty on October 29, 2002, 02:39:24 pm 1. don't hate; participate.
2. i bet you have a PhD (playa hatin' degree) Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Bondo on October 29, 2002, 04:00:21 pm Bucc, the reason I don't like you is because you treat others poorly on the fourms. I just ask for a little civility. The only people I dislike on the forums are the handful like you who feel it is ok to be assholes. And we have 500 members...to think it is only 1% that I don't like. From the way you and the others act, your % is much much higher. Maybe you should take something from that.
Oh, and as for my polluting the other threads, the Desert Storm thread was about a video game, not current events/politics, so your posts are just as off topic. Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Deadeye on October 29, 2002, 04:15:54 pm Bucc, the reason I don't like you is because you treat others poorly on the fourms. exactly who does he treat poorly besides you bondo? who that doesn't deserve it? who that hasn't treated him "poorly" in the first place. i thought he was more then civil to rapid over the not hosting thing. i think if you look back he tried to be civil with zait, until he noticed that zait just never really reads or consideres his posts. i think he's given you more then one chance, yet you don't give him the common, basic respect of admitting you are wrong when you are flat out proven wrong. please, spare the the lies about your other valid logic. don't you see, that sort of bullshit is insulting to him? you see, making shit up like that to try and support a weak position is the same sort of thing that rapid does. yes, you do it better and are more believeable. but you were called on it bondo. and instead of just admitting that you are wrong, you shift it to an emotional argument about him, so people forget about you and your make believe school of logic. it's an old trick, you do it well, but it's also transparent to some of us. so, for you people who wonder why, there's a good start. as for him changing the subject in the desert storm game thread, guess again bondo. zaitsev started the rant. bucc answsered it. realized how far off topic it was going. admitted his error (crediting somone with pointing it out) and then you came in, making it about bucc. the posts are there for you to go back in read. why don't you try it. don't skim them, read them. consider them. show some respect of your own. Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: jn.loudnotes on October 29, 2002, 10:28:07 pm Whoa. . .I'm as competitive as the rest of you, and I've been annoyed equally by all parties here, so I hesitate to defend anyone. But this is ridiculous:
Quote basic respect of admitting you are wrong when you are flat out proven wrong.? please, spare the the lies about your other valid logic.? don't you see, that sort of bullshit is insulting to him? Basic respect of admitting you're wrong??! Who do you think you are? When we're debating matters of opinion, or fact even, since when do we have to admit defeat?! Sure, it might be more gracious, but who are you to demand that Bondo or anyone else grovel everytime you prove a point? It's only insulting to be countered if you believe yourself above your opponent. And frankly, if you have any such high-minded bullshit, get off the forums. The reason this upsets me is that this forum is and should be about debate. I'll use an example of proper debate with myself and Ace. We disagree frequently, but never once have I been upset by Ace's failing to concede me a point. And, as far as I know, he feels likewise. ;) What fun is arguing if you have to abase yourself every time you're wrong? Now, Ace I believe has a good deal of animosity towards Bondo as well, but I don't think he's resorted to unbased personal assaults and mockery. If so, it's been in jest. But I fail to understand how any of you can be so full of yourselves as to take offense at what amounts to very minor differences of opinion. Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: |MP|Buccaneer on October 30, 2002, 12:57:30 am Basic respect of admitting you're wrong??! Who do you think you are? When we're debating matters of opinion, or fact even, since when do we have to admit defeat?! Sure, it might be more gracious, but who are you to demand that Bondo or anyone else grovel everytime you prove a point? It's only insulting to be countered if you believe yourself above your opponent. And frankly, if you have any such high-minded bullshit, get off the forums. LMAO, and who's being high-minded now Loudnotes? Let me explain it in terms closer to you. You know music, right? Horn player, right? So, if I were to start telling you, in this forum, that there was this new way to play your horn, that it was as good or better and that you didn't know what you were talking about, that wouldn't insult you? Now, imagine that you not only have been playing that horn for years, but you've studied it, it's history, everything about it, and have a college degree in music. When you ask the idiot where his knowledge of this new way of playing comes from, he ignores you. When you ask where he learned it, he ignores you. But he continues to post about why he's right about it. You don't find that insulting either? Deadeye may have overstated the admission of defeat, or you may have just taken it to mean more then it was (think about that too Loudnotes). But conceding a point is a sign of intelligence. I do it all the time. I read something new, learn something new, and just flat out say it. But, even if that isn't your style, do you continue to defend a point that you know isn't true Loudnotes? In all your disagreements with Ace, does Ace stay on that soapbox after you have proven the point, or does he move on? I'll bet he moves on. Ace doesn't strike me as someone stupid enough to back a point that he knows is false, just because he's stubborn. Bondo, dislike me all you want. Doesn't bother me a bit. I just tell it like it is. I'm not a caring parent, or a teacher. I'm not your friend. I'll help people out that ask questions that I can answer (like VooDoo and others). But what I see you not liking is that I don't let you save face. You were wrong, I called you on it. I asked often for where this school of logic is, so I can study it. You ignored it. You ignore half the shit I write, which, when in a debate, brings a whole new meaning to asshole. One last thing Bondo. I want you to find all these people that I treat poorly. Who are they? Name them for me? Because, other then you, I'd argue that. I treat Zaitsev about the same as he treats me. I treated Rapid better. I look back and don't see any problem with the way I treated Tasty, Cookie, Jeb or anyone else the disagreed with me. I read all their posts, and answered their points with points of my own. I don't have to agree with them, they don't have to agree with me. But they showed the respect to read and discuss. They gave and took points, along with me. With you, it seems like it's a contest. You want to be the big mac daddy of the forums. One last note for Loudnotes. Loudnotes, I think one of the reasons that you don't have this problem is because you chose to debate with more intelligent people then Bondo. I should learn from that. Since Bondo is the only person that I've ever had this problem with. Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: (SiX)Ben on October 30, 2002, 01:07:45 am All I wanna say is the dislike is mutual between you two... Bucc, Don't try to say Bondo started it..
Quote Loudnotes, I think one of the reasons that you don't have this problem is because you chose to debate with more intelligent people then Bondo.? I should learn from that. That's as insulting toward him as he is to you.. Also, Bondo... You're not gay... Get over it! Ben Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Ace on October 30, 2002, 01:11:09 am One last thing Bondo. I want you to find all these people that I treat poorly. Who are they? Name them for me? How about me Bucc. Yeah, you know what I'm talking about. Mr. "I'm going to make jokes about the Stanley Cup being in Detroit this year and not in San Jose" even though Moses spent less time wandering the desert than the Cup spent out of Detroit for a time there. It's fine, even if you are an insensitive prick about stuff like that. Nabokov is going to shut the Wings down tonight and we will start the march to winning the Cup this year. That's what you get for being a BAD, BAD man. Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: (SiX)Ben on October 30, 2002, 01:17:38 am Come to think about it... I feel I have been wronged by Bucc's rooting against the Giants game 6... Oh... Now it's obvious... Bucc treats me unfairly, DAMNIT!
Ben Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Cossack on October 30, 2002, 01:27:41 am I would like to point out first that Bucc throws cyanide gas at puppies. We all know that Bucc also molests little boys. Bucc,as little of you know made a pact with teh Devil. Bucc will eat bunny rabbit heads out in public in exchange for making himself unbearably sexy to all genders. Bucc is also the soul operator of the evil industrial military complex. He is what those conspiracy theorist talk of... The New World Order. Bucc you are a very very very bad bad man.
Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: EUR_Zaitsev on October 30, 2002, 02:04:36 am Bucc, the reason I don't like you is because you treat others poorly on the fourms. exactly who does he treat poorly besides you bondo? who that doesn't deserve it? who that hasn't treated him "poorly" in the first place. Dead Eye, He treats me very poorly thank you. Now I am liberal or, rather a radical liberal and he doesnt see the world in that way and I am 100% fine with that. He can have the views he wants but it gets to me when he insults my grammer, and the way I am typing my thoughts. I am 14 years old and I doubt that many of you at the age of 14 could sit here and type out the politcal insight that I am. For him to attack my views is bad enough as it is, he can rebuttle no doubt but when he crosses that line of personnally attacking ME as a person thats down right mean and to a kid, he deserves ban. And for all of you that read this, sitting there smirking your just as much at fualt as he is. He clearly doesnt repect a juivinile thus he wont care when I say its out of line for him to attack me personally but if your reading this and not saying anything to him or posting anything then your just as much to blame as he is Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: *NADS Capt. Anarchy on October 30, 2002, 02:09:30 am wow cossack... buccaneer made a pact with ejo? whodathunkit!
Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Shade on October 30, 2002, 02:15:27 am damn... This sounds way too much like the political ads that are on tv this time of the year. Buccaneer made personal attacks against Zaitsev, do you want him elected for senator? No, you want bondo. Why the hell is there always a fight in the forums... Oh yea, thats right, we consider it human nature. Yet, I have seen many people with no where near as much need to fight as you guys....
Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Bondo on October 30, 2002, 02:27:50 am Shade that reminds me...To Ace and Bucc who were calling me unpatriotic in not voting...one reason I have not interest is that here in Colorado the negative campaign ads are absolutely barbaric. I don't want to vote for someone who uses that method, and for this election that is everyone.
Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: EUR_Zaitsev on October 30, 2002, 02:35:19 am Yea I dont vote either HAHHAHAAH still I request that if there is another attack on me as a person rather then my views from Bucc there should be some ban time at least
Title: Buccaneer is Deceiving Pregidous Character. Post by: AK_Rap1d on October 30, 2002, 02:51:58 am Well, I don't like how you discriminate against all |?K|'s by not letting us host on the MacClans host. You claim free service for all mac clans, but that's completely false. It should say, free hosting for clans you (bucc and deadeye) like. That'd be the more appropriate way for you to present yourself. I came in all politely asking about hosting in MacClans.com, and I was banned from the forums and then told that my style wasn't liked and they refuse to host our |?K| site. Then they said they don't hate all |?K|, yet the |?K| site is EVERYONE. I just happen to be the webmaster/leader. Then you refused to give a proper explanation and double talked around the issue. Simply saying you had reasons, but would post them later. LMAO! I've never had an arguement with you, and it always surprises me that you treat me like some asshole that deserves no respect. In fact, the way you present yourself with a service that is supposedly for our whole RS community, is a very wrong role for you to play if you're going to only be hosting for clans you like. You should advertise that since that's the truth. Don't advertise that you're here for our community cuz you're not. You're here to hook up your personal friends in your "Forum Circle". Advertise that. >:(
-Rapid- Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Shade on October 30, 2002, 03:00:14 am And can you believe all of this is built up over 2 computer games. And then it dawns on me, no wonder we have wars, grudges, massacres, discrimination, etc. around the world
Why get built up over a game, play it and have fun, thats what it was inteded for Title: Re:Buccaneer is Deceiving Pregidous Character. Post by: PsYcO aSsAsSiN on October 30, 2002, 03:13:11 am You're here to hook up your personal friends in your "Forum Circle". Please Rapid, why should they provide a service to you when all you do is insult them? Macclans was originally Grifter's and you insulted him too, that is why he didn't want you on his site. While it is open to almost any macclan that needs hosting, they have the right to refuse service to annoying jackasses like yourself. Oh yeah, don't go into this "Forum Circle" bullshit because we all know it doesnt exist. You mentioned it before and we made you look stupid - but that isn't too hard to do. Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Oso on October 30, 2002, 03:25:50 am Quote I came in all politely asking about hosting in MacClans.com, and I was banned from the forums and then told that my style wasn't liked and they refuse to host our |?K| site. that is mostly 3/4 false, you came in asking politely , yes, but then you didnt get your way and cried... here's the quote so you dont try to bs your way out of this "Rapid, I don't think so" <----WTF is that all about Deadeye? I am an old active RS player that has contributed a lot to our community and even dedicated a page for Grifter when he died. ?Did he die? I can't believe you're gonna try and treat me like this, but I guess that's the attitude you want to carry online. ? I am a extremely competitive RS player and I've stood up against all BS people claim. ?Guess if that's soooo offensive to you that you won't let me host my clan website, then you got problems. ?This is the internet and if you're gonna carry grudges for I can't even recall why, then you really need help, or friends. ?Try telling me why you "hate me" enough to not let me have space for our Clan, Winner of the *DAMN Tournament and the BL this year. ?KoS took the next BL, and we'll see how we do this season. ?In the meantime, try not carrying out so much hatrid and explaining yourself... ?Bad Kharma is nothing cool to have riding on you... " dont have a fit Title: Why does aSs feel the need to defend bucc and deadeye? Hmmm... I wonder... Post by: AK_Rap1d on October 30, 2002, 03:33:08 am [Oh yeah, don't go into this "Forum Circle" bullshit because we all know it doesnt exist. You mentioned... Listen you Forum Whore (probably president), How the fuck have I insulted those 2 when I don't even speak to them. They insulted me by denying |?K| to host our website with MacClans when we were all avid supporters of Grifter and we all mourned his passing and praised the good times with him. We are humans and we have hearts and it touched us deeply when we heard of his passing. I ended my beef with him right away there. That doesn't mean Deadeye and Bucc got a right to come back as his disciples and carry a grudge against me. Especially after I deeply expressed my sorrows. Guess that doesn't register in your evil mind, since all you got up there is negativity programmed to be carried out against me whenever you get a chance. I suggest you place yourself out of this arguement that had nothing to do with you in the first aSs. Of course, unless you feel the need to defend your "Forum Circle" buddies so they don't look bad... Hah! You're burnt. (http://dynamic.gamespy.com/~damnr6/yabbse/YaBBImages/icon_lol.gif) Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Shade on October 30, 2002, 03:40:17 am Im so fucking glad you guys listen to your voice of reason so often... please continue with yet another arguement that will turn into yet another flame war...
Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Deadeye on October 30, 2002, 03:57:31 am Dead Eye, He treats me very poorly thank you. Now I am liberal or, rather a radical liberal and he doesnt see the world in that way and I am 100% fine with that. He can have the views he wants but it gets to me when he insults my grammer, and the way I am typing my thoughts. he is a liberal too zaitsev. you were the one calling him a conservative. so, isn't that you insulting him? i haven't seen him actually insult your grammer yet. i've seen him ask what the hell you are talking about, because your grammar is so bad that it's hard to tell at times. but that's not an insult, that's a fact. an insult would be "zaitsev, you write like english is your second language, and gibberish is your first." that is an insult. i haven't seen anything like that yet. I am 14 years old and I doubt that many of you at the age of 14 could sit here and type out the politcal insight that I am. it's good to have confidence, but zaitsev, you think a little too little about people here. you don't know what most of us were like at 14. stop thinking you are better then we were back then. For him to attack my views is bad enough as it is, he can rebuttle no doubt attacking your views is bad enough? zaitsev, what do you think that debate is all about? if your views are solid, then they can stand attack. hell, you should be attacking them yourself. i think this is the problem in a nutshell zaitsev, you are too thin skined about your views being questioned. sorry, but it's going to happen. but when he crosses that line of personnally attacking ME as a person thats down right mean and to a kid, he deserves ban. And for all of you that read this, sitting there smirking your just as much at fualt as he is. He clearly doesnt repect a juivinile thus he wont care when I say its out of line for him to attack me personally but if your reading this and not saying anything to him or posting anything then your just as much to blame as he is well zaitsev, i want you to go back and qote some of his insults to you. then i'll go quote some of your insults to him. and, it has nothing to do disrespecting you because you are a kid. he didn't know you were a kid when you were debating. he doesn't disrespect other kids either, if he disrespects anything, it's people that disrespect him. you keep saying that things are clear, they aren't. as for asking bucc to be banned zaitsev, maybe you should look at your own actions, and see if they are as bad or worse. rapid, first you blamed bucc for my decision, you don't seem to understand that one. second, all you have to do is read our tos, it is pretty clear that we don't host for everyone. third, it wasn't all ak that was turned down, just you were. i know that you were told this before. you politely asked, and were politely turned down, and then you mouted off, and you were banned. it was real simple. i don't want to deal with you, don't need to deal with you, and pretty much solved my problem. stop blaming bucc, blame me. then blame yourself. shade, this has nothing at all to do with a game. ace, it's 3-2 wings so far. so take that as another insult =P Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Ace on October 30, 2002, 04:25:09 am ace, it's 3-2 wings so far. so take that as another insult =P Got a little salt and pepper? Eating crow tastes so bad by itself. Also, for Rapid and everyone else, enough of the macclans deal already. Get over it. Title: Deadeye is Wrong about MacClans. It's a HOST SERVICE FOR HIS FRIENDS ONLY. Post by: AK_Rap1d on October 30, 2002, 04:30:50 am rapid, first you blamed bucc for my decision, you don't seem to understand that one. second, all you have to do is read our tos, it is pretty clear that we don't host for everyone. third, it wasn't all ak that was turned down, just you were. i know that you were told this before. you politely asked, and were politely turned down, and then you mouted off, and you were banned. it was real simple. i don't want to deal with you, don't need to deal with you, and pretty much solved my problem. stop blaming bucc, blame me. then blame yourself. Well, try explaining yourself, rather than playing "Mr. Bigshot with a host to my friends". Bucc said you didn't like my style, so you wouldn't host to me. Well not hosting for me, means not hosting for my clan since I'm the webmaster. Is this Grifter's wish to carry out his grudge against me with you 2 discriminating against me, which equals out to discriminating against our clan. I have presented myself properly in all past situations which is why I still stand here with pride of myself and the |?K|'s. It's people like you that discriminate against us for no reason(since you won't even mention one other than you have the right to say no) that cause the BAD ENERGY around here. Like I asked before, was this Grifter's Last wish to act like this towards me and my clan, or any clan that you 2 personally dislike for this matter? >:( I don't even know you, or ever talked to you Deadeye, yet you feel you have this grudge you need to act out. It's obvious this is deeper. Now we need to find out how deep and how you dug yourself so deep into this... Title: Re:Buccaneer is a BAD, BAD man. Post by: Ace on October 30, 2002, 04:37:57 am For fuck's sake, do you ever stop?
This thread is locked, and if you try to carry this bullshit on in a new thread, that will be locked too. |